Cases 41 - 50 of 384
Smith v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2022cv00363
Defendant:
Tracy Smith and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. FedEx et al
as 5:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Gerald R Smith
Defendant:
FedEx, Frederick W Smith, EBAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Smith v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
George A. Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, Benton County Sheriff's Department, Henry County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tobias v. Smith
as 1:2022cv10609
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tobias
Defendant:
Frederick Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Smith-Rapaport v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Avi Smith-Rapaport
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rider et al v. Uphold HQ Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rider, Jesse W. Smith, Gilles Boevi and others
Defendant:
Uphold HQ Inc., John Does, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Architectural Busstrut Corporation v. Smith LC et al
as 8:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Architectural Busstrut Corporation
Defendant:
Smith LC, Steven C Smith and Douglas M Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Tilden Smith
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shields et al v. Highland Industries Inc
as 4:2021cv03638
Plaintiff:
Wanda Shields, Ada Ashe, Almeria Henderson and others
Defendant:
Highland Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tobias v. Smith
as 1:2021cv11736
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tobias
Defendant:
Frederick Smith
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
