Cases 41 - 50 of 2,970
Morgan v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Michelle Morgan
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al
as 1:2022cv10462
Plaintiff:
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 I.B.E.W. and San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Association
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank U.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Quirch Foods, LLC., et al v.Cargill, Inc., et al
as 0:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Quirch Foods, LLC., Butts Foods, LP, Quirch Louisiana LLC and others
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporations, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
California, State of v. INOAC Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv12935
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
INOAC Corporation, INOAC Group North America, LLC and INOAC USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03550
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Compass Group USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Open Cheer & Dance Championship Series LLC et al v. Varsity Spirit, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Not Classified By Court:
USA FEDERATION FOR SPORT CHEERING doing business as USA CHEER
Plaintiff:
OPEN CHEER & DANCE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES, LLC,, THE OPEN CHEER AND DANCE LLC, DEEP SOUTH CHEER, INC. and others
Defendant:
Varsity Spirit, LLC, U.S. ALL STAR FEDERATION, INC., INTERNATIONAL ALL STAR FEDERATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
California, State of v. Faurecia Abgastechnik GmbH et al
as 2:2023cv12907
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
Faurecia Abgastechnik GmbH, Faurecia Systemes d'Echappement, Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies, USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
