Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff: John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant: Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Winn v. Higher Education Coordinating Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Shasta Winn and Shasta Stewart Winn
Defendant: Higher Education Coordinating Commission, Ben Cannon, Ramona Rodamaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant: LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Jeffrey Sulitzer, et al v. Joseph Tippins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55735
Plaintiff / Appellant: SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC, a Tennesse limited liability company and JEFFREY SULITZER, D.M.D., an individual and a California Professional Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: YVETTE CHAPPELL-INGRAM, MPA, in their official capacities as Officers and/or Members of the Dental Board of California, FRAN BURTON, M.S.W., in her official capacity as a Member of the Dental Board of California, JOSEPH TIPPINS, individuals and others
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D, et al v. Joseph Tippins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08902
Defendant: M.P.A. Karen M. Fischer, Esq. Meredith McKenzie, D.D.S. Lilian Larin and others
Plaintiff: SmileDirectClub, LLC, Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D. and D.M.D. Jeffrey Sulitzer
Petitioner: DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Dudley v. Buffalo Rock Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00519
Appellee: Buffalo Rock Company and James C Lewis, III
Appellant: Stewart Ray Dudley
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
In re: Shawne Alston, et al v. NCAA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15566
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENDALL TIMMONS, ALEX LAURICELLA, INDIA CHANEY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC., NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, The NCAA, MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Intervenor: AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., CBS BROADCASTING, INC., ESPN ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS and others
RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC et al v. Stewart We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01132
Plaintiff: Firefly Agency LLC and RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Merrilee Stewart and Norman L. Fountain
Counter Defendant: Fritz Griffioen, Rodney Mayhill and William Griffioen
3Rd Party Defendant: James R. Carnes, Esq.
Counter Claimant: Linda Resch, Kevin Becker, John Mathers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STEWART v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv01083
Defendant: FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC and others
Plaintiff: SLOAN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant: KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff: ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re: IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?