Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Rocco DeGrazio v. Carolyn Colvin, et al
as 16-3080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCCO J. DEGRAZIO
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and AARON E. GOODSTEIN, Sued as Magistrate Judge Aaron Goodstein
Moccia v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv04007
Plaintiff:
Diane Moccia
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Maehr v. Koskinen, et al
as 16-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY T. MAEHR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KOSKINEN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, JOHN VENCATO, Revenue Agent, GINGER WRAY, Revenue Agent and others
Dillon v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv04330
Plaintiff:
Barry Jason Dillon
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dickerson v. Colvin et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lee William Dickerson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Jimmy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson et al v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02113
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robertson , Jenny Rose and Kathy Collins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ij Federal Question Injunction and Declaratory Relief
Annie Millsapp v. Carolyn Colvin
as 16-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIE M. MILLSAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
HOWELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00352
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laura Jennings v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ASHTON B. CARTER, Secretary of Defense, CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and others
JENNINGS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2016cv00004
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOILS, ET AL, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
