Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Johnson v. Biden et al(MAG+)(MEMBER)
as 2:2021cv00269
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Barack Obama, Queen Elizabeth and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv01838
Defendant:
Michael Greco, CSO Lisa, Brian Mchugh and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Johnson v. Byers et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Angela Byers, Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin D. Johnson, Jr. and Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Duke University Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
President OBama, Angela Byers, United Nations Members and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZHAR v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Dr. Salman Azhar
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Azhar v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00182
Plaintiff:
Dr. Salman Azhar
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sidney Harr v. Richard Brodhead
as 16-1846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D., President, DUKE UNIVERSITY, C/O PAMELA J. BERNARD, GENERAL COUNSEL, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
HARR v. BRODHEAD et al
as 1:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, DAVID F. LEVI, DUKE UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT., AARON GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sidney Harr v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D. and others
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE PAUL TREVOR SHARP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
