Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Khan v. City of Lodi et al
as 2:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Muddsar Khan
Defendant:
City of Lodi, Michael Hitchcock, N. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn et al v. Klamath County Fire District No.1 et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Estate of Teresa Vaughn, Vivian Kimbol, Richard Vaughn, Sr and others
Defendant:
KLAMATH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1, Stephen R. Hedlund, Chief Greg Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Webb v. State Of Texas et al
as 3:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
William T Webb
Defendant:
State Of Texas, GPD and Hitchcock TX PP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitchcock v. Town of Poestenkill, New York et al
as 1:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hitchcock
Defendant:
Town of Poestenkill, New York, Keith Hammond and Tracy Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witt v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson and Stevenson Hitchcock
Plaintiff:
Lenard Thomas Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. The Palm Beach Post Newspaper et al
as 9:2021cv80054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Diaz
Defendant:
Olivia Hitchcock and The Palm Beach Post Newspaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Garcia v. City of Sacramento, California et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Richard Hitchcock, Rick Braziel, John McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nute v. Tyson et al
as 4:2020cv01920
Defendant:
Christopher Zito, Leah Hitchcock Braswell, Christina Corona and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Nute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assi v. Hanshaw et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Robert Bowles, John Chapman, Sheriff Jeffery S. Lawless and others
Plaintiff:
Hassan Adran Assi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
