Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant: WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee: L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant: William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunaway v. State of South Dakota et al
as 5:2023cv05028
Plaintiff: Teressia E. Dunaway
Defendant: State of South Dakota, Pennington County/County of Pennington, Sgt. Rosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff: K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant: THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party: GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GenBioPro, Inc. v. Sorsaia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff: GenBioPro, Inc.
Defendant: Mark A. Sorsaia, Patrick Morrissey and Patrick Morrisey
Amicus Curiae: The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas, The State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Clark v. Colorado Division of Securities, The, et al.
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff: Jason Ray Clark
Defendant: CDS, Colorado Division of Securities, The, United States Securities Exchange Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton Walker v. Cory Shafer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1610
Plaintiff / Appellant: Clayton Walker
Defendant / Appellee: Cory Shafer, in his individual and official capacity and City of Rapid City
Defendant: United States, State of South Dakota and Police Dept.
Lewis v. State of South Dakota We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv05083
Plaintiff: Aimee Lewis
Defendant: State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. The State of South Dakota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03005
Defendant: Tori Gordon and The State of South Dakota
Plaintiff: Joshua L. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?