Cases 11 - 20 of 56
TD Development, LLC v. City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Steven Dixon, Connie Fitch, Jay Hovey and others
Plaintiff:
TD Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Whitten et al
as 2:2020cv01099
Defendant:
Francis Whitten, The City of Las Cruces doing business as The Las Cruces Police Department and Thaddeus Allen
Plaintiff:
Mark Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panicaro v. Storey County et al
as 3:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Eric Kern, Storey, County of, Gerald Antinoro and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Panicaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nebavi v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Julio Perez, Nathan Whitten, Lee Pinto and others
Plaintiff:
Egnifinh Cedrik Nebavi
Ford v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2019cv02741
Defendant:
Ronald Nelson, Robert Moore, David Marconi and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. The Las Vegas Police Department
as 2:2019cv00023
Defendant:
The Las Vegas Police Department
Plaintiff:
Lara Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Sinton Indpendent School District et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Monica Roberts
Defendant:
Sinton Indpendent School District, Pari Whitten and Esteban Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Brantner et al
as 4:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Dale Whitten
Defendant:
Matthew Brantner, Elaine Kross, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv01084
Plaintiff:
Joan Bell
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, James Brown, Dennis R Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Atwood, II v. Daniel Thomas, et al
as 16-60271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL THOMAS, Officer, CHRIS TANKERSLEY, Officer, PENNY JONES, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
