Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Taylor v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland et al v. Stuart et al
as 5:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland and Huyen Cleveland
Defendant:
Roger Stuart, Richard Kirby, Lori Dewey-Oller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Taylor et al v. City of Colton et al
as 5:2013cv01330
Defendant:
City of Colton, Colton Police Department, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mindi Hilborn, Brandon Jackson, Kayla Jackson and others
Parchman v. Taylor, City of et al
as 2:2012cv13094
Plaintiff:
Shenika Parchman
Defendant:
Taylor, City of and Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yvette Burrows, et al v. Marc Gaynier, et al
as 12-1309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
YVETTE BURROWS and TAURNYA BURROWS
Defendant:
MARC GAYNIER, GREGORY HENKE, DAVID COWELL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL TAYLOR
Hunka v. Roane County Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00539
Plaintiff:
Melissa L Hunka
Defendant:
Roane County Board of Education , Darrell Langley , Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rahr et al
as 2:2011cv01795
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Sue Rahr , King County Sheriff's Office , Donald K. Sherck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD et al
as 1:2011cv02710
Plaintiff:
DOLORES INGRAM
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD, DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE, MICHAEL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Loftis et al
as 6:2010cv02483
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Steve Loftis and S N Peeples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Tazewell County et al
as 1:2010cv01268
Defendant:
Tazewell County, Robert Huston, Aleisha Karrick and others
Plaintiff:
Everett Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
