Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Jones v. Croft et al
as 2:2012cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Defendant:
Gary R. Croft and Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. McCann et al
as 2:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Charles Brumfield
Defendant:
Charles McCann , Thomas Ramey, Jr., Judy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harless v. McCann et al
as 2:2012cv01480
Plaintiff:
Maria Phoebe Harless
Defendant:
Charles McCann, Thomas Ramey, Jr., Charles Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Depew v. Krisher et al
as 2:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rhett G. Depew
Defendant:
Gary Krisher, Lisa Bethel, Timothy Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Morris, et al v. Ronald Kesselring, et al
as 12-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE MORRIS and PAMELA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT KESSELRING, ZUMBRUM, Officer, JAMES ROWE, II, Officer and others
Defendant:
ADAM FABRI
David Morris, et al v. Robert Kesselring, et al
as 11-4360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE MORRIS and PAMELA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT KESSELRING, ZUMBRUM, Officer, JAMES ROWE, II, Officer and others
Cofield v. Haleyville, Alabama, City of et al
as 6:2011cv04113
Plaintiff:
Tommy Cofield
Defendant:
Haleyville, Alabama, City of, Shane Whitten, Jonathan "Andy" Marbutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. City of Harlingen
as 7:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Maria Dahlia Perez
Defendant:
City of Harlingen, Carlos Yerena, Harlingen Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
