Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Harris v. City of Oak Ridge et al
as 3:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harris
Defendant:
City of Oak Ridge , Mark Watson , Gary Sender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARVEY v. KING et al
as 2:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN GARVEY
Defendant:
KEITH A. KING, GALVANEK, BEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Moss et al
as 2:2011cv00551
Plaintiff:
Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Yandle Moss and Darin Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2011cv05251
Plaintiff:
Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Yandle Moss, Jane Doe Moss, Darin Beam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Lapaglia et al
as 3:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Felix Charles Booker
Defendant:
Michael A Lapaglia, MD , Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge , Team Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sherman et al
as 2:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Judge Sherman, Judge Ruban, Judge Ellattien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duff v. Oak Ridge, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Angelo Duff
Defendant:
Oak Ridge, Tennessee , The Oak Ridge, Tennessee Police Department , David Beams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAM et al v. REED et al
as 2:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
DUANE L. BEAM and SALLY JO BEAM
Defendant:
PARKER REED and BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Leja v. Sabol, et al
as 09-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. LEJA
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL, Warden, FMC Devens, SANDRA HOWARD, Medical Director FMC Devens, C. BEAM, MD, Physician, FMC Devens and others
Defendant:
DAVID WINN, former Warden, FMC Devens and BRIAN HERTEL, Assistant Warden, FMC Devens
RASIEWICZ et al v. WACHOVIA BANK et al
as 3:2009cv01846
Plaintiff:
DIANE RASIEWICZ and EDWARD RASIEWICZ
Defendant:
WACHOVIA BANK, REGIS CORPORATION, JODI BEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
