Cases 81 - 90 of 5,086
Lori v. InsuranceHub Leavitt Agency, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Lori Adams
Defendant:
InsuranceHub Leavitt Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Esseily v. Hochul et al
as 1:2024cv02932
Plaintiff:
Ali Esseily
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Sciarra v. State Capitol Police Dept et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
State Capitol Police Dept and Adam Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avanru Development Group, Inc. v. Swanzey, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Avanru Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Swanzey, NH, Town of, Ann Karasinski, Adam Mulhearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dollar v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dollar
Defendant:
Derek Adams, Chasta Harrison and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lee v. Labat
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee, III
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Pajer v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11146
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAJER
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC., WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC. and REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
