Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 89 of 89
ROBINSON v. WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR et al
as 1:2008cv04721
Plaintiff: ALEX ROBINSON
Defendant: WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, FREEHOLDER JOSEPH RIPA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Juan McGee v. Thomas Monahan, et al.,, et al
as 08-3200
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUAN MCGEE
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS MONAHAN, CAROL VANCE, JOVITA ANYANWU and others
Lymon v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00386
Plaintiff: Davon Lymon
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Joseph Neubauer, Charlie Carrizales and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Buss v. Aramark
as 2:2007cv01147
Plaintiff: Jamie Buss
Defendant: Aramark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
TRAVILLION v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00928
Plaintiff: JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, DAN ONORATO, RAMON R. RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gambill v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Inc
as 3:2007cv00048
Plaintiff: Gary Gambill
Defendant: Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
RODGERS v. MOLINO et al
as 2:2006cv05622
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER J. RODGERS
Defendant: ANTHONY MOLINO, ANTHONY MOLINO, METHODIST HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2006cv00138
Plaintiff: Michelle Hinton
Defendant: Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Grzely v. Aramark Ed Resources, et al
as 1:2000cv01509
Plaintiff: Carla Grzely
Defendant: Aramark Educational Resources, Inc., Jane Pernicone and Anthony Defrancesco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?