Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Alvarez v. McMillian et al
as 2:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Alvarez
Defendant:
Unknown McMillian, Unknown Herling, Charles Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nowlin et al v. Pritzker
as 1:2020cv01229
Plaintiff:
Peter Ptak, Karla Boldt, Quinton S Mister and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAUERS v. OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LP. et al
as 2:2019cv01429
Defendant:
OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LP., KEVIN RILEY, BUILDERS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
PETER SAUERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Lamonica Lewis, Sergeant Alvin Jones, any other yet-unidentified officers of the Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Mister Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misters v. State of Illinois DCFS
as 1:2014cv01465
Plaintiff:
Terribia Misters
Defendant:
State of Illinois DCFS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Mister Price Inc.
as 3:2013cv01369
Plaintiff:
Dalila Sanchez
Defendant:
Mister Price Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Duke Energy et al
as 6:2011cv01420
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mister Money Financial Services Inc v. Winnebago County Wisconsin et al
as 1:2008cv01084
Plaintiff:
Mister Money Financial Services Inc
Defendant:
Winnebago County Wisconsin, Michael E Brooks and E Geschrei
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
