Cases 1 - 10 of 30
LIN-HENDEL et al v. DUPUIS et al
as 3:2023cv03956
Petitioner:
DR. CATHERINE G. LIN-HENDEL, PH.D. and DR. RUDOLF H. HENDEL, PH.D.
Respondent:
KATHERINE DUPIS, KAREN M. CASSIDY, THOMAS J. WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
B.R. et al v. Quin
as 3:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
B.R., L. T., A. B. and others
Defendant:
Margie Quin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B.R. v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2021cv08014
Plaintiff:
B.R.
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.R., a minor v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2019cv04317
Defendant:
Franklin Edmond, Kathy Martinez, Laura Garnette and others
Plaintiff:
B.R., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archie et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv04838
Plaintiff:
Savannah Brown, Jhaimarion Jackson, Krystal Archie and others
Defendant:
B.R Anderson, City Of Chicago, Craig Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.R. v. CITY OF JASPER et al
as 3:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
B.R.
Defendant:
CITY OF JASPER, JON FLECK and JASPER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp) et al v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2017cv11093
Plaintiff:
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp), Ronald Jones, II [E-Filer], House of Zen and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
J.R. et al v. Bowers et al
as 8:2016cv01633
Plaintiff:
N.R. , B.R. and J. R.
Defendant:
Larry Bowers and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
FILING ERROR
as 1:2016cv00471
Defendant:
City of Round Rock, Round Rock Police Department, Round Rock Police Officer A.J. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Jr. Russell Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rasche et al v. Lane et al
as 1:2015cv07918
Defendant:
B.R. Lane , Illinois Department of the Lottery, The , Illinois Lottery Control Board and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rasche and Daniel Chasteen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
