Cases 1 - 10 of 1,350
Hunter v. Auclair
as 3:2024cv30115
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Chase Carmen Hunter
Defendant:
Joanne Auclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
MUDD et al v. WISEMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VAN WINKLE, GARY CUNNINGHAM and JOHN DAVID MUDD
Defendant:
DAVID WEINBRENNER, CRAWFORD COUNTY, INDIANA, NATHAN WISEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Devin Wade v. Samantha Chase
as 5:2024cv01935
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Samantha Chase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernards v. Prod Holding Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01522
Defendant:
Inn his care (Barry Reever), Meta Platforms, Collection Northwest and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Bernards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Means v. Pegan et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert Means
Defendant:
Brandon Cox, CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, Kevin Pegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YAN v. FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv04734
Plaintiff:
YAN YAN
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY and FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWBERRY v. PITTSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
BRANDON NEWBERRY
Defendant:
PITTSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS GALLICO and CHASE FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01223
Defendant:
Joshua Hardy, Irvin Cates, Robert Lemay and others
Plaintiff:
Annette Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanton v. Boaz City Jail et al
as 4:2024cv01210
Defendant:
Boaz City Police Department and Boaz City Jail
Plaintiff:
Chase Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
JAMES v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2024cv04656
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JAMES
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
