Cases 1 - 10 of 34
West San Carlos Court Apartments LLC v. Hang
as 3:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
West San Carlos Court Apartments LLC
Defendant:
Woo Ri Dong Hang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEE v. DONG BANG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv21824
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEE
Defendant:
DONG BANG CORPORATION, MI JA KIM, JU HI KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Curtis et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Aila Curtis, Ciera Agee, Alison Archer and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, PeaceHealth, Liz Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOMBARDOZZI v. JIANG et al
as 4:2023cv00182
Defendant:
WEOZHONG JIANG, MING CHENG WANG, WEI ZHONG JIANG and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE LOMBARDOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 3:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, Deborah A. Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIU et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04900
Plaintiff:
LI HUA LIU, XUE XIU LIU, GUANG ZHONG LI and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dong Huang v. Jalea Hill, et al
as 18-40608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONG SHENG HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
JALEA JOECHELLE HILL, KAREA MARIE WILLIAMS, MURPHY OIL USA, INCORPORATED and others
chang et al v. Hayes et al
as 5:2017cv11135
Plaintiff:
dong chang , Christina Chang and Sushi Samurai, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin D. Hayes, Stephen C. Morse and Linda Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
