Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Smith v. YouTube, LLC
as 0:2024cv60441
Plaintiff:
Mr. Chris E Smith
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Smith v. Carrillo et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E Smith
Defendant:
Samantha Carrillo, Cheryl Ward, Christina Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Yost et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jacques E. Smith
Defendant:
David Yost, Hon. Judge Richard P. Ferenc, Hon. Judge Charles L. Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Beard v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Dale Bernard Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel E. Smith and Cpl. Adam Albaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Lieberman v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, M.D., Moira Tashjian, Thomas E. Smith, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIDDLETON v. PYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00729
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. MIDDLETON
Respondent:
PAULA K. PYATTE, REBECCA M. EIMERMAN, BRIAN H. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LaHue et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Vonnah Lee LaHue and Robert Asah LaHue
Defendant:
Diane K. Smith, Steven Robert Anderson, Charles Droege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pliego II v. Smith
as 8:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ronald Pliego, II
Defendant:
Jared E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasquez v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00448
Defendant:
Diego Velasquez and William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
