Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
George Clark, et al v. Anthony Abdallah, et al
as 23-1730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE EDWARD CLARK and KEVIN HARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY ABDALLAH and KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF INKSTER, MI and JOHN T. HERMANN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Gregory Hill, deceased
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
(PS) Spearman v. Towing et al
as 2:2021cv01288
Defendant:
Jill N. Wood, Hanna Boyce, Victoria Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Edward Spearman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2019cv02178
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Clark
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GREENE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05444
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN THOMAS, MARVIN GRAAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CLARK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and STEVEN E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Love v. Piatchek, et al.
as 4:2014cv01830
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Love
Defendant:
Paul Piatchek , Mathew Karnowski , Marcus Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2012cv03760
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CLARK
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, THOMAS BOYD, DETECTIVE STEPHEN KORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
