Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lauter v. Katoskie et al
as 2:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Joseph John Katoskie, III, Kamala Lanetti, George Schaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
as 9:2023cv81121
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pierce
Defendant:
Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Mamot v. Proctor & Gamble Corp.
as 22-373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patricio R. Mamot
Defendant / Appellee:
Procter & Gamble and Glaxosmithkline Corp.
Mamot v. Proctor & Gamble Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv06914
Plaintiff:
Patricio R. Mamot
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Corp. and Glaxosmithkline Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Pfizer
as 20-617
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories, Inc., Panadol, Nurofen and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Lauter v. The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) et al
as 2:2019cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Glaxosmithkline (GSK) and The Commonwealth of Virginia (commonwealth)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, William Taylor, Brenda Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Busine
as 10-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant - Appellee:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, SUNIL BALASAHEB PATIL and others
Rhonda Theus v. GlaxoSmithKline, et al
as 10-5649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONDA THEUS
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Defendant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
