Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Defendant:
Town of Highland Park, Texas, William (Bill) Lindley, Tobin Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mowrey v. Delaney
as 2:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mowrey
Defendant:
Jenifer E. Delaney and Jennifer E. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cecile Lescs v. City of Winchester
as 22-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECILE M. LESCS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WINCHESTER, ANIMAL WARDEN LIANG, ANIMAL WARDEN SLONAKER and others
Defendant:
KEVIN SANZENBACHER, Former Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT BAUSERMAN, MR. HESS and others
Lescs v. City of Winchester et al
as 5:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Ltn Bauserman, Eden Freeman, Animal Warden Liang and others
Plaintiff:
Cecile M. Lescs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowrey v. Windham et al
as 3:2018cv00584
Defendant:
Town of Windham , Willimantic Police Dept. , Willimantic Switchboard Fire Chiefs Association, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David J Mowrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Mowrey et al
as 1:2015cv04497
Plaintiff:
Anwah Jones and William S. Watkins
Defendant:
Brandon L. Mowrey, James G. Carson, Robert C. Bagwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert et al v. Mowrey et al
as 1:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr. and Ayman Abdullah Latif
Defendant:
B. Mowrey , J. T. Williams , Corporal Unknown Name and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowrey v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Foster Mowrey
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of, C M Taylor and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowrey v. Rumsfield
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
Delia Mappe Mowrey
Defendant:
Donald H. Rumsfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
