Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 6:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matusak v. Daminski et al
as 6:2021cv06058
Defendant:
Deputy Stephen Murphy, Sgt. Brian Unterborn and Deputy Matthew Daminski
Plaintiff:
Christopher Matusak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. The City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
SUZANNE MURPHY and VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Pat Magee, East Baton Rouge Parish, S Carey and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston et al v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Berlin et al
as 4:2013cv40115
Plaintiff:
Tamara Z Johnston and Archibald Johnston
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of Berlin , Emerson Chandler , Linda Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandles v. Batista et al
as 2:2012cv11773
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Andrew Batista, George C Steeh, Doug Smith and others
Pinkal et al v. City of Hamilton et al
as 9:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Pinkal and Nadine Pinkal
Defendant:
City of Hamilton , Nic Painter, Stacy McElderry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
