Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Naqvi v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv02252
Defendant:
Kevin Wein and Maricopa County Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Syed Omar Naqvi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorsey v. Eli Lilly et al
as 2:2024cv04150
Defendant:
Dr. Syed and Eli Lilly
Plaintiff:
Jimetro Allen Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hasan v. ECFMG et al
as 1:2024cv10438
Plaintiff:
Dr. Prof Syed MK Hasan
Defendant:
ECFMG, Francine Katz, Katherin Oleyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC and SYED NURUZZAMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACQUELINE C. ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Askari v. Taj and Ark, LLC
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Syed Askari
Defendant:
Taj and Ark, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv20928
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP OF NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shah
as 1:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Syed Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deide et al v. Day et al
as 7:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Sidi Mouhamed Deide, Adama Sy, Abdallahi Salem and others
Defendant:
County Executive Edwin J. Day and County Executive Steven M. Neuhaus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Bey v. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Razin Amaru Solomon Bey and Black, Javares
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Matthew C. Hansen, Rebecca M. Macleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
