Cases 141 - 150 of 418,820
James-El v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Harry Sharod James-El
Respondent:
The State of North Carolina, County of Mecklenburg, City of Charlotte, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Debnam v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Kevin Debnam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00368
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
Jasper Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabrera v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv01064
Petitioner:
Ivonne Cabrera
Respondent:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newcomb v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Bryant Patrick Newcomb
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024at00722
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez (PS) v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent:
D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
