Cases 11 - 20 of 1,081
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08507
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Curry
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Stacy Curry
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stalter v. Curry et al
as 1:2023cv00404
Petitioner:
Jason Stalter
Respondent:
Vistula Curry and Charlene Hagerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
Devonta Curry
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Seattle King County Superior Courts et al
as 2:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Seattle King County Superior Courts and Western State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rios v. The Tim Curry Center et al
as 4:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael Rios
Respondent:
The Tim Curry Center, Acclaim Physicians, Pro Path Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jeriton Curry v. US
as 23-6128
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
