Cases 11 - 20 of 3,034
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Davids
as 5:2024cv10684
Petitioner:
Brandon Lewis Cain
Respondent:
John David and John Davids
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Derrick Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Lewis Valentine v. F. Guzman
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Joe Lewis Valentine
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04022
Petitioner:
Travis Cain Lewis
Respondent:
State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Lewis
Respondent:
Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
