Cases 11 - 20 of 2,311
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Rymir Phillips
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berckmann (PS) v. Executive Director CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Jon Berckmann
Respondent:
Executive Director CDOC, Colorado Supreme Court, Phillip Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Carpenter v. Shawn Phillips
as 24-5356
Petitioner:
DARRELL CARPENTER
Respondent:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
PHILLIPS v. VANIHEIL
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
VANIHEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
