General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Ronald Smith v. United States Parole Commissio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2887
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00892
Petitioner: Ronald Richard Smith
Respondent: United State's Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00386
Petitioner: Ronald Craig Smith
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2015cv00022
Petitioner: Ronald Maurice Smith
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald Smith v. United States Parole Commissio, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4045
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Smith v. Peart We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv03173
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent: Mario Peart
Petitioner: Ronald G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hill et al
as 1:2013cv02833
Petitioner: Ronald Edward Smith
Respondent: Victor K. Hill, Harold R. Banke Justice Center and Clayton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald Smith, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6860
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD DEVON SMITH, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD E. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Ronald Smith, Jr. v. Don Roper
as 13-1527
Petitioner - Appellant: Ronald R. Smith, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: Don Roper
Ronald Smith, Jr. v. Troy Steele
as 13-1247
Petitioner - Appellant: Ronald R. Smith, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: Troy Steele

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?