Cases 21 - 30 of 345
Foster v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00983
Petitioner:
Carlos Randolph Foster
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01382
Petitioner:
Randolph McDowell
Respondent:
State of Maryland, Baltimore City Circuit Court and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oshay Randolph v. Larry Fuchs
as 22-1826
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSHAY S. RANDOLPH
Respondent / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Randolph v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv14147
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Randolph and Tommie Randolph
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03049
Petitioner:
Kevin Randolph
Respondent:
Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shayfer Randolph v. Fuchs
as 1:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Oshay Shayfer Randolph
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Kay Ivey, Randolph County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. McFadden
as 3:2021cv00651
Petitioner:
Charles B Randolph
Respondent:
Gary L. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.