Cases 21 - 30 of 2,726
Steven Ingalls, Jr. v. Frank Vanihel
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
STEVEN INGALLS, JR.
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Tepper v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1271
Plaintiff:
FRANK TEPPER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Frank Evans v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10464
Petitioner:
FRANK J. EVANS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Pate v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hyppolite, III v. Kendall et al
as 8:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ralph J. Hyppolite, III
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Lloyd J. Austin, III, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynolds v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Frank M Reynolds
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
KENDALL JOHNSON
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Berry v. Campbell
as 2:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Frank Alexander Berry
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muns v. S.C.D.C.
as 9:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Frank Muns
Respondent:
S.C.D.C., Director of the Laurens County Detention Center and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
