General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 756
AVERY v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv04443
Petitioner: FRED AVERY, JR.
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cloud v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00502
Petitioner: Fred Cloud
Respondent: E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzales v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00233
Petitioner: Louis Fred Gonzales
Respondent: Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fred Dorton v. D. Samuel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06522
Petitioner: Fred Dorton
Respondent: D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00651
Petitioner: Fred Peters
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2022cv01527
Petitioner: FRED PETERS
Respondent: JOHN R. GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holcomb v. Warden Truitt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01877
Petitioner: Fred R. Holcomb, Jr. and Fred R Halcomb, Jr
Respondent: Warden Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Woodall, III v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11126
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT FRED WOODALL, III
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Fred Hall v. R. Hudgins
as 22-6208
Petitioner / Appellant: FRED HALL
Respondent / Appellee: R. HUDGINS
Joseph Flowers v. Fred Foulk
as 21-17121
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH J. FLOWERS
Respondent / Appellee: FRED FOULK, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?