Cases 31 - 40 of 789
Hughes v. Javier Salazar
as 5:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Frank Hughes
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes Jr v. Shoop
as 2:2023cv00411
Petitioner:
Odis Hughes Jr
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hugh Robinson v. Acting Warden
as 23-55105
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUGH ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN
Hughes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01421
Petitioner:
Steven Franklin Hughes, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00485
Petitioner:
THOMAS L. HUGHES
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hughes v. El Paso County Sheriff
as 1:2022cv03033
Petitioner:
Peter Hughes
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Respondent:
El Paso County Sheriff, Colorado Springs Police Department and State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01535
Petitioner:
John Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Hughes
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Jason J. Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Samuel Trelawney Hughes v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv06450
Petitioner:
Samuel Trelawney Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America and McKinley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
