Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Powell v. Banks et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks , United States Bureau of Prison(s) and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castillo-Campos v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv01828
Petitioner:
Serafin Castillo-Campos
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyer v. The United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017hc02161
Petitioner:
Jaymes Meyer
Respondent:
The United States Bureau of Prisons, FMC Butner Medical Director and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv02063
Petitioner:
Carlin Q. Williams
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Joe Moorehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dutschke v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv00419
Petitioner:
James Everett Dutschke
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary, Tucson, JT Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hocker v. Chapa et al
as 1:2017cv00347
Petitioner:
Roshay L Hocker
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa, United States Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyer v. The United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2017cv00434
Petitioner:
Jaymes Meyer
Respondent:
The United States Bureau of Prisons, FMC Butner Medical Director and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SCHMURA v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv08686
Petitioner:
PAUL JOSEPH SCHMURA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amr Mohsen v. Steven Langford, et al
as 16-56585
Petitioner - Appellant:
AMR MOHSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN LANGFORD and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
ZAKHARENKO v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2016cv00183
Petitioner:
IVAN VALERIYEVICH ZAKHARENKO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
