Cases 41 - 50 of 392
Santos v. Tarrant County Sheriff's Department's Sheriff Bill Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
John Santos
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Santos v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00704
Petitioner:
Florentino Noel Santos
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz-Solano v. Russell
as 2:2022cv02303
Petitioner:
Santos Elena Ruiz-Solano
Respondent:
Eileen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orlina v. Clarke
as 1:2022cv00417
Petitioner:
Christopher Santos Orlina
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00023
Defendant:
Santos V. Hernandez and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al(Polk County)
as 8:2022cv00532
Petitioner:
Santos Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES-OLAN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
SANTOS D. TORRES-OLAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10036
Petitioner:
Angel Santos
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas v. Kelly
as 6:2021cv01843
Petitioner:
Santos Cuevas
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2021cv12019
Petitioner:
Angel Santos
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
