Cases 41 - 50 of 3,034
Lewis v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Ben Hill County
as 1:2023cv04867
Petitioner:
Chaney Lewis
Respondent:
Ben Hill County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
M Gutierrez and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sibomana v. Bernacke
as 2:2023cv01710
Petitioner:
Lewis Abdul Kalim Sibomana
Respondent:
Michael Bernacke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riche v. Forrest County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Justin Riche
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail, Unknown Lewis, Major Unknown Carson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis vs Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LEWIS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2023cv03973
Petitioner:
JIBREEL LEWIS
Respondent:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Buchanan, II v. Donald Curley
as 23-1883
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LEWIS BUCHANAN, II
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD CURLEY, Warden
Lewis v. Russell
as 6:2023cv06567
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lewis
Respondent:
Eileen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roman Perdono v. Felix Taylor
as 23-6965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROMAN DALACIO PERDONO
Respondent / Appellee:
FELIX TAYLOR and ROBERT C. LEWIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
