Cases 41 - 50 of 846
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Petitioner:
Cynthia Watson and Cynthia Joann Watson
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Adam C Driggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watson v. State of Nevada
as 2:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
Kedria D. Watson
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Fasano
as 23-1635
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE BYRON WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
EDWARD J. DOLAN, Commissioner of Probation, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General and DIANE FASANO, Commissioner of Probation
Watson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Watson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Edward Watson
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
Michael Gordon Watson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 23-6573
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Watson v. Starr
as 1:2023cv01219
Petitioner:
Pierre Watson
Respondent:
M. Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
