Cases 51 - 60 of 2,108
Wyatt v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02151
Petitioner:
George Wyatt, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas, USA, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Kelly
as 23-1777
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK HENDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SHEILA KELLY, Superintendent, MCI Concord
Thomas v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02207
Petitioner:
Daimean Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bellot v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv01705
Petitioner:
Vincent Bellot
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Christopher Kelly and Christopher Kelley
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Weaver v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00454
Petitioner:
Dianne L. Weaver, Philip J. Emerson, Jr. and P J Emerson
Respondent:
Jerry Parker and Alfonso Charles
Defendant:
Kelly Cole, Holly Lake Ranch Association (HLRA), Patty Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emerson v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Philip James Emerson, Jr
Respondent:
Jerry Parker, Kevin White and Kelly Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivera v. Kelly
as 1:2023cv12046
Petitioner:
Heriberto Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Bass v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6847
Petitioner:
KELLY DANIEL BASS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
