General Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 273
Gaddy et al v. Land et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff: Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant: George Dwain Land, Clayton Smith, Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
REESE v. ZETECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02710
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: GEORGE A. REESE
Respondent: DUSHAN ZETECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Porter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff: Garrin David Smith
Defendant: D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Reese et al
as 3:2017cv01128
Petitioner: James Ramon Lewis
Respondent: Sheriff Michael Reese and Capt. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Federal Public Defender's Office
as 9:2017cv80770
Plaintiff: Clarence B. Reese
Defendant: Federal Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Young We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv03053
Petitioner: Eric J. Reese
Respondent: David L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reese v. Collier We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00843
Petitioner: Roderick L Reese
Respondent: Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace Dean-Mitchell v. Constance Reese
as 17-10773
Petitioner - Appellant: WALLACE DEAN-MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee: CONSTANCE REESE
Reese v. Collier
as 4:2017cv00217
Plaintiff: Roderick L Reese
Defendant: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Collier
as 3:2017cv00181
Petitioner: Roderick L Reese
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?