Cases 61 - 70 of 15,002
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Demari D. Lee
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Dixon (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00830
Petitioner:
Ricky Raynard Kelly
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Louis Vereen, Jr. v. Wakulla Corectional Institution Admnistration, et al
as 24-11356
Petitioner:
LOUIS D. VEREEN, JR.
Respondent:
WAKULLA CORECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMNISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
KENON v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cromartie v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024hc02089
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
