Cases 71 - 80 of 1,082
SANCHEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01311
Petitioner:
CESAR SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacinto Sanchez v. L. Bird
as 2:2023cv01702
Petitioner:
Jacinto Sanchez
Respondent:
L Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
John J. Sanchez Diaz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cedeno-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
Bonifacio Omar Cedeno-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moreno-Sanchez v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Santos Moreno-Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez v. Divris
as 23-1172
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner
Mendoza v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Amador Sanchez Mendoza
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00332
Respondent:
Arnulfo Sanchez and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Sanchez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
