Cases 81 - 90 of 1,823
Savcedo v. Warden, MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Hector Hernandez Savcedo
Defendant:
Warden, MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobson v. Hernandez
as 3:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
Hakiem Jordan Dobson
Respondent:
A. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez Daniels v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12045
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERNANDEZ DANIELS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hernandez Alamilla v. Warden at FCI Petersburg
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Hernandez Alamilla
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Petersburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HERNANDEZ v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
RALPH HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
RALPH HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon Hernandez v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2023cv11330
Petitioner:
Kelvin Ariel Calderon Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Lopez-Hernandez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Vantell
as 3:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
Porfirio Hernandez
Respondent:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
