Cases 81 - 90 of 1,857
Rodriguez-Robles v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-Robles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kostka v. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv11428
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kostka
Respondent:
Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rodriguez-Cardona v. FCI Mendota Warden
as 1:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez-Cardona
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Briggs et al
as 1:2023cv01021
Petitioner:
Quame Wilfredo Denzel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Gregory Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02691
Petitioner:
Jhon Castro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez-Ruiz v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Antonio Rodriguez-Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarez Rodriguez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Carlos Francisco Alvarez Rodriguez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Havier
as 2:2023cv01057
Petitioner:
Vincent Edward Rodriguez
Respondent:
Martin Havier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv01049
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro-Rodriguez v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Marcial Navarro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
