Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Gould v. State of Conn et al
as 3:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Gould
Respondent:
State of Conn and GA-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gould v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2023cv00860
Petitioner:
Roland Andra Gould
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOULD v. ATLANTIC COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2023cv01777
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GOULD
Respondent:
ATLANTIC COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gould v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gould v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gould v. Duarte
as 22-1943
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GOULD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID DUARTE, Superintendent, MTC
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-6255
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner, Director of Department of Public Safety
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-6195
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner, Director of Department of Public Safety
Burleson v. Townsend et al
as 6:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Tracy Donte Burleson
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend, IV and Jason N Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burleson v. Townsend et al
as 3:2021cv03189
Petitioner:
Tracy Donte Burleson
Respondent:
Lonnie Townsend, IV, Jason N Gould and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
