Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Martha Rosario Gonzales
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MERCADO ROSARIO v. PETERS
as 3:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO ROSARIO
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS and WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MERCADO ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
LUIS MERCADO ROSARIO
Defendant:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MERCADO ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 3:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and COLLETE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MERCADO-ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Streevel
as 7:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Misael Rosario Pacheco, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosario v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ROSARIO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
