Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Wiggins v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Symphoni Vernice Wiggins
Respondent:
Assistant Warden Brammer and Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Savely v. Eller
as 4:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Antywan Savely
Respondent:
Assistant Warden f/n/u Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. TDCJ et al
as 7:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Cruz
Defendant:
TDCJ, Sheriff Dept, Assistant Warden FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savely v. Eller
as 3:2022cv00701
Petitioner:
Antywan Savely
Respondent:
Assistant Warden f/n/u Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendall v. Garza et al
as 7:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Kendall
Defendant:
Senior Warden Kimberly L. Garza and Assistant Warden R. Almanza
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kendall v. Garza et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee Kendall
Respondent:
Senior Warden Kimberly L. Garza, Assistant Warden R. Almanza and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinnon v. Wingfield
as 2:2021cv02441
Petitioner:
Reginald McKinnon
Respondent:
Assistant Warden Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAWSON v. WARDEN, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv03125
Respondent:
ASSISTANT WARDEN JONES and WARDEN, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hatchett v. Nines et al
as 8:2020cv02059
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Assistant Warden Jeff Nines
Petitioner:
Timothy Earl Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendoza v. Atwell et al
as 6:2020cv00031
Respondent:
Assistant Warden D.C. Gonzales, Lorie Davis, FMS FNU Atwell and others
Petitioner:
Ruel Reynaldo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
