Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Regenold #231948 v. United States District Court
as 2:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Regenold
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Michael v. Lewis
as 4:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael
Respondent:
Officer Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christopher Patterson v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 23-15592
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL PATTERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nelson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Nelson
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Christopher Williams v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3607
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP
SAENZ v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SAENZ
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jensen #056119 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00750
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Jensen, Michael Christopher Jensen and Michael Jensen
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinshaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01955
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tye v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00138
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Tye
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferrell v. Boyd
as 3:2021cv00402
Defendant:
Bert Boyd
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
