Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes-Sanabria v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cervantes-Sanabria
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Viviana Cervantes v. Warden
as 5:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
Viviana Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CERVANTES v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00163
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE ANTONIO CERVANTES
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 9:2023cv02472
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gino Cervantes v. Shawn Moore
as 2:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Gino Cervantes
Respondent:
Shawn Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Petitioner:
Cosme Castillo Cervantes
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juan Cervantes v. Warren Montgomery
as 22-55567
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN MANUEL CERVANTES
Respondent / Appellee:
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden
Ali v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Hassan Ali
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval, C. Cervantes, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
