General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Patterson
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. WILKES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner: DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant: WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Mann v. Doug Clark, Warden, et al
as 22-2750
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent / Appellee: Doug Clark, Warden, SDSP and Attorney General of South Dakota
Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00082
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Gallow
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00088
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Gallow
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann v. Clark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv04158
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent: Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Ray Loyd v. Neil McDowell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv07695
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Loyd
Defendant: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Ray Loyd v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2020cv09101
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Loyd
Defendant: Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Garza County Sheriff, et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Respondent: Lindsey Osborne, Terry Eaton, NFN James and others
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLLOWAY v. BROWN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00408
Petitioner: DANIEL RAY HOLLOWAY
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?