Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Carlin
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Kilby Dee Williams
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Young v. Schuyler
as 2:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Ronald D Young and Ronald Dee Young
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oluwaseun v. Mayokas et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Shomefun Oluwaseun and John Dee
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayokas, Charles Markos, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv16708
Petitioner:
Deshanta Young
Respondent:
Dee-Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McAnalley v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00904
Petitioner:
Robert McAnalley and Robert Dee McAnalley
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stang v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Joe Dee Stang
Respondent:
Israeli Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valentinis-Dee v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv02767
Petitioner:
James Valentinis-Dee
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dee Jones v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Darrick Dee Jones
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
