Cases 1 - 10 of 11
King v. Johnston County
as 5:2024hc02153
Respondent:
Johnston County
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Johnston County
as 5:2024hc02129
Respondent:
Johnston County
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Ransom et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Darnell Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent Ransom, Attorney General Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv02866
Petitioner:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torriano Williams v. Dunlap
as 11-7110
Petitioner - Appellant:
TORRIANO DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF FLORENCE and DUNLAP
Williams v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2011cv00645
Petitioner:
Torriano Darnell Williams
Respondent:
Warden Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2010cv01502
Petitioner:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Striedel
as 1:2010cv00015
Petitioner:
Darnell Williams
Respondent:
Michael Striedel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ault
as 3:2007cv03072
Plaintiff:
Darnell Williams
Defendant:
John Ault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
